The Right Response #2
Does a Gun in Your Hands Kill or Protect You?
Such mistaken thinking may be behind fundamentalist Muslims insisting their women are covered from head to foot, so that men are neither attracted nor tempted by their beauty. Although those in the western world like to think they know how to think, gun control fanatics nevertheless apply that same thinking to guns.
There are even control freaks who apply this erroneous thinking to cans and bottles. If enormous quantities of cool drinks are bad for you, then the government must ban the sale of large size drinks. It seems that the nanny politician running New York doesn't understand the concept of individual responsibility and tried to institute such a law! Fortunately, the courts have more sense and struck it down as unconstitutional.
1. The Biggest annual Killers
Click to Expand
image courtesy of www.liveleak.com
The US Government itself has issued a list of the ten biggest killers, thanks to liveleak.com for this image.
By far the biggest annual killer is tobacco, responsible for over half a million American deaths a year.
The second is Medical Errors causing some 200,000 deaths annually - well over ten times more people than guns. So should we ban medics? Of course not, modern medicine saves far more lives than die from medical errors by medics.
The fourth biggest is Alcohol Abuse at around a hundred thousand deaths. The USA tried banning alcohol and eventually abandoned Alcohol Prohibition as a complete failure around a hundred years ago.
The next largest killer? Many more people die from automobile accidents each year, yet no one is seriously suggesting banning automobiles. This was tried in Britain many years ago - the infamous Red Flag Act - and also abandoned as ineffective.
By far the biggest annual killer is tobacco, responsible for over half a million American deaths a year.
The second is Medical Errors causing some 200,000 deaths annually - well over ten times more people than guns. So should we ban medics? Of course not, modern medicine saves far more lives than die from medical errors by medics.
The fourth biggest is Alcohol Abuse at around a hundred thousand deaths. The USA tried banning alcohol and eventually abandoned Alcohol Prohibition as a complete failure around a hundred years ago.
The next largest killer? Many more people die from automobile accidents each year, yet no one is seriously suggesting banning automobiles. This was tried in Britain many years ago - the infamous Red Flag Act - and also abandoned as ineffective.
Click to Expand
Large Caption
In 2011, hammers caused 50% more deaths than so called assault rifles. So should society ban hammers as responsible, or do we appreciate the value hammers provide?
Firearms are tenth on the annual biggest killer list - and most of these are suicides. Yet guns stop much criminal mayhem and save many people's lives, as do medics. Just ask State Witness military and law enforcement master trainer, elite firearms expert Larry Correia. Or Dr. Susan Gratia, whose parents were murdered in a mass shooting in front of her eyes, see the really powerful moment shortly after the five-minute mark.
But if banning medics and hammers wouldn't work, and banning alcohol and automobiles has already proved a complete failure, what makes anyone think a ban on assault rifles, or any other type of firearm, would be anything but yet another dismal government failure?
Firearms are tenth on the annual biggest killer list - and most of these are suicides. Yet guns stop much criminal mayhem and save many people's lives, as do medics. Just ask State Witness military and law enforcement master trainer, elite firearms expert Larry Correia. Or Dr. Susan Gratia, whose parents were murdered in a mass shooting in front of her eyes, see the really powerful moment shortly after the five-minute mark.
But if banning medics and hammers wouldn't work, and banning alcohol and automobiles has already proved a complete failure, what makes anyone think a ban on assault rifles, or any other type of firearm, would be anything but yet another dismal government failure?
2. Individual Responsibility - Carry a Gun for your Defense
Responsible citizens use firearms to protect themselves and deter crime rather than to initiate an attack. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of crimes are stopped each year by people simply showing they are carrying a gun without firing a shot.
The police carry firearms to protect themselves as well as to deter criminals. President Obama's security guards carry guns to protect him. Why? Because guns have a proven track-record in deterring attacks from both criminals and deranged individuals.
Aren't you also entitled to use a gun to protect yourself from criminals and deranged individuals? Legal gun owners are responsible citizens who own a gun solely for this purpose. The most frequent reason for owning for a gun is deterrence, and there's overwhelming evidence proving how well guns provide for your protection against criminals, intruders and rapists.
3. The Kennesaw Gun Law caused a 79% drop in crime
The low crime rate resulting from widespread gun ownership has attracted both people and jobs. The population has sharply increased, over 30,000 now call this outstandingly safe city home. "Companies have said they want to be located in conservative areas," says the Cobb Chamber of Commerce President Bill Cooper. "Kennesaw is home to more manufacturing businesses than any other Cobb city."
This is a very inconvenient truth for gun control advocates who pretend that guns are not needed for personal defense - even though their armed guards all carry guns. How do they sabotage the undeniable conclusion that universal gun ownership causes an enormous decrease in crime? Writing in the supposedly unbiased "Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia," authors Englander and Snell produced a misleading, untruthful hatchet job.
4. Defensive gun usage
Yet defensive gun usages generally don't make the news. "Some belligerent youths approached John Doe on Main Street, but they ran away when he pulled out his concealed carry gun." Hardly a newsworthy item!
Yet how many such incidents are there a year. Newsweek reports that one very credible investigation found: "There are more than 2 million instances a year of the armed citizen deterring or stopping armed criminals; a number four times that of all crimes involving firearms."
**UPDATE**. Many years ago, surveys by the CDC measured nearly 2.5 million defensive gun uses (DGUs) a year - but were never made public. That number matches the results of Gary Kleck's ostensibly controversial survey, and these unpublished CDC surveys confirm that innocent people use guns to defend themselves from violent crime far more often than guns are used by criminals! see Reason magazine reveals Defensive Gun Use surveyed but not published by the CDC
** Your Next Step **
- Dramatically improve your family's safety
- Do the police or the government have any legal duty to protect you [The
]The Right Response? How to reduce violent crime and guarantee your safety!
Food for Thought
"You can't argue with the fact that Kennesaw has the lowest
crime rate of any city our size in the country!"
- Mayor Leonard Church, who was not in office in 1982 when Kennesaw unanimously passed the USA's first ever law making gun ownership mandatory
This article was originally published at ezinearticles:
http://ezinearticles.com/7525169
© Copyright worldwide Cris Baker, www.LifeStrategies.net. All rights reserved. Republishing welcomed under Creative Commons noncommercial no derivatives license preserving all links intact, so share this widely!
< - previous article | next article - >
> There's much more to enjoy about Universal Gun Ownership:
- DOLLAR SAVINGS that encouraging gun ownership brings
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT takes off
- Effective implementation strategy and education ensure success in DECREASING VIOLENT CRIME
- RAPE DISAPPEARS at concealed-carry Colorado State University
- REDUCE RACIAL TENSIONS. Improve racial harmony with all your minorities - including responsible blacks
- The BENEFITS available from encouraging gun ownership
- The POLITICAL FUSS needs careful management and a cautious well-thought-out strategy
> The Right to Protect Yourself series of articles:
> The Right Response series of articles
The articles in The Right Response series are:
Addendum refuting 21 common liberal arguments
- The government response?
- Does a gun kill or protect you?
- Mass shootings continue to increase
- Gun control advocates
- Defensive gun uses
- Gun violence
- Instantaneous response
- Armed security or armed teachers?
- Second Amendment
- Does one size fit all? The 10th Amendment
- Why disarm responsible citizens?
- The UN Global Gun Grab
- Stop overworking the police
- Jury nullification
- Safe driving at speed
- How to defend the innocent?
- Who can you trust?
- Who's responsible for your family's safety?
Addendum refuting 21 common liberal arguments
The violent crime reductions benefit everyone when law-abiding, responsible citizens are encouraged to be able to defend their families and themselves from violent criminals, rapists, refugees, and terrorists. When women and seniors are armed, they can defend themselves from attacks by usually young, male and stronger violent criminals. Yet there's no sanction or penalty if you choose not to be armed. Despite misrepresentation and media misunderstanding, Universal Gun Ownership is neither Mandatory Gun Ownership nor Compulsory Gun Ownership, it's simply your choice.
All our products are fully guaranteed, these time-tested secrets of success are delivered electronically - no waiting for delivery.
All our products are fully guaranteed, these time-tested secrets of success are delivered electronically - no waiting for delivery.
DC98 TRR-2 Does a gun kill or protect you page9