e. Gun control advocates believe their opinions are automatically right, simply because it's what
they think. Just like dictators, they assume they're always right, see
being right. But everyone has made mistakes, we've all had thoughts which proved wrong later. So everybody already has proof their thoughts are not always right.
f. They know how to agree or disagree, but gun control advocates don't know how to think. They mistakenly believe that acceptance or rejection is thinking objectively. But choosing who to believe is choosing - NOT rational thinking!
g. Gun control advocates such as Britain Piers Morgan confuse believing with thinking. He attempted career suicide with his vulgar emotional attacks demonstrating he doesn't know how to think for himself.
It's obvious when someone has thought critically, they discuss the issue rationally.
When they're unwilling to look at the evidence, yet can't defend their opinion intelligently, they get emotional. Getting upset, along with insults and ignoring the facts, simply demonstrate their failure to think.
h. Infamous
Nazi (National Socialist) dictator Adolf Hitler disarmed his Jewish citizens to eliminate any armed resistance. Mind you, he's not the only dictator who's disarmed the population, they all do. Gun bans and restrictions demonstrate that ruling politicians do
not have your welfare at heart.
i. Or there's some other reason. Since there's abundant evidence to prove that disarming citizens does NOT protect them, do gun control advocates have another reason?
Is their goal gun control - or is it people control? Nazi mass-murderer Hitler explains in: "Hitler's Table Talk, 1941-1944: Secret Conversations"
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms ...
All conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."